Bennett v. Bell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.
The driver of an automobile or motor vehicle is bound to the exercise of ordinary care in the operation thereof for the safe transportation of his guests and other passengers and to avoid personal injury to them, and this duty extends to all such passengers, whether guests by sufferance, invited or self-invited. Black v. Goldwebber, 172 Ark. 862, 291 S. W. 76, 2 R. C. L. 1183; Huddy, Automobiles, 117, § 18; Mitchell v. Raymond, 181 Wis. 591, 195 N. W. 855, 859.
There are two acts of negligence alleged in the complaint; the driving of the car at an excessive and dangerous rate of speed, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mitchell v. RaymondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Black v. GoldweberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
3Cited by17 opinions
- Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Shannon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Harkrider v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Pollard v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.