Legal Opinion
Burbank v. Succession of Barton
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 18, 1906No. 15,951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of St. James; Paul Léehe, Judge. Action by E. W. Burbank against the succession of Eu D. Barton. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement.
MONROE, J.
The transcript shows that, on October 24,1904, plaintiff ruled defendant to show cause why a release bond executed by him should not be decreed insufficient, and the property affected by it returned to the sheriff; that by judgment signed November 21, 1904, the rule was discharged; that on December 1, 1905, there was a trial, the whole story of which is told in the following minute entry, to wit:
“Offered in evidence by counsel for defendant in rule:
“(1) The original rule of October 24, 1904. The judgment of his honor, the judge, of November 21, 1904.
“Plaintiff in rule…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Many Iron Works v. KayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- McCabe v. Keystone Life Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912