Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lloyd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1977No. 14472Published

1DissentEllett, Chief Justice

In order for one crime to be included in another crime, there must not be any elements in the lesser that were not also in the greater.1 The law is stated in 7 Am.Jur.2d., Automobiles and Highway Traffic, Section 343 as follows:. . . Furthermore, since the offense of taking and using á motor vehicle without the consent of its owner is distinct in its elements from the offense of larceny, an acquittal of one of these offenses is not a bar to a prosecution for the other.

The reason for this is that there is an element in depriving an owner which is not required for the crime of larceny. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gaskin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. State v. AshUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API