Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sharma v. Meyers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1990No. WD 43729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The issue presented in this action in prohibition is whether under § 537.060, RSMo 1986 a tort-feasor who has settled with the plaintiff, who despite not having been sued is subject to contribution by a joint tort-feasor against whom the plaintiff has obtained a judgment. Section 537.060, which became effective on September 28, 1983, reads as follows:

Defendants in a judgment founded on an action for the redress of a private wrong shall be subject to contribution, and all other consequences of such judgment, in the same manner and to the same extent as defendants in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. New Liberty Hospital District v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of RaytownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Goff v. St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. Copper Mountain, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Curators of the University of Missouri v. MoorhouseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Millentree v. Tent Restaurant Operations, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
  4. Spring Lake Pork, LLC v. Great Plains Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API