Legal Opinion

People v. Stevens

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1995No. H012456PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Defendant Charles Roland Stevens was charged by information with four counts of intercepting cordless telephone communications. (Pen. Code, § 632.6, subd. (a).) He pleaded nolo contendere to two of the counts. He appeals the judgment of conviction, contending that section 632.6 is invalid because the area is preempted by federal law.

We affirm.

Facts

After defendant’s van was stopped by Officer Duscio, defendant consented to a search of the vehicle. Duscio found inside the vehicle electronic equipment, 24 audiocassettes with names of women handwritten on them, a scanner, and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Halpin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Radio Telephone Commun., Inc. v. Southeastern Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whitaker v. GarcettiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API