Legal Opinion
Harnly v. Watson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 4, 1987No. 86-1035PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONOVER, Judge.
The appellants, R. Daniel Hamly, James L. Carter, Jr., Graydon R. Howe, and I. Lamar King, the majority stockholders of Watson and Company, seek review of a final judgment in favor of the appellee, William A. Watson. We agree with the appellants’ contention that the jury was improperly instructed on damages and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial on damages. We affirm the trial court in all other respects.
On September 18, 1984, Watson and Company removed Watson from his position as chief executive officer of the corporation. A stock purchase agreement entered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Luster v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- SECURITY MUTUAL CAS. CO. v. BleemerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Adkins v. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Lawson v. SwirnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Matalon v. GreifmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simmons v. RoordaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- PINELLAS BD. OF COM'RS v. BettisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Pinellas County ex rel. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995