Legal Opinion
Barone v. Adams
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Suozzi, J.
This is an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. The relief sought in the notice of motion is for (1) an order granting a review of the respondents’ determination “ in terminating the appointment ” of petitioner to the faculty of Hofstra College, and (2) an order annulling respondents’ determination and restoring petitioner as a lecturer at Hofstra College. The respondents, instead of answering, have moved to dismiss the petition pursuant to section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act on several grounds, among which are (1) that the petition failed to state facts suEcient…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Harris v. Commissioners of the Land OfficeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. New York, Lake Erie & Western R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- People ex rel. Cecil v. Bellevue Hospital Medical CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Penn-York Natural Gas Corp. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Nametra, Inc. v. American Society of Travel Agents, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gray v. Canisius CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Barone v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Olsson v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979