Legal Opinion
Trunbull v. MTA New York City Transit
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Navigation Law § 181 to recover damages resulting from the discharge of petroleum, the plaintiffs James M. Turnbull, Jocelyn Mondesir, Lucille J. Caputo, Cesar Ramos, Linda Biancorosso, Nicholas Biancorosso, *648Evelyn Israel, Charles S. Hughes, Mary E. Hughes, Loretta Stucchio, Eileen M. Ball, Philip M. Scotto, Geraldine L. Scotto, Anna Rita Oppedisano, Vincenzo Oppedisano, Maryse Fecu, Cathryn Thom, Veronica M. Muscante, Charles R. Muscante, Steven Gregos, Joanne Gregos, Anthony Deprisco, Joseph A. Hunt, Junior A. Edwards, Bernice Dalton, Milton McCormack,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commerce Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- 87th Street Owners Corp. v. Carnegie Hill-87th Street Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- AMCO International, Inc. v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Halliday v. Norton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Melohn v. R&M Combustion Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Turnbull v. MTA New York City TransitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006