United States v. Martin Wunderlich Co. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
In these renegotiation cases, the Government requests review of two decisions of the Tax Court of the United States which held non-renegotiable a contract under which the Secretary of War had theretofore determined the contractor 1 had realized large excessive profits.
The facts may be briefly stated. In December, 1940, The Panama Canal accepted Wunderlich’s bid on the excavation for the new Gatun locks and appurtenant works on the Atlantic side of the Canal. The contract therefor, numbered PClp-571, became effective when it was approved February 20, 1941, by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- U. S. Electrical Motors, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Blanchard Mach. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Stimson, Secretary of WarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Eastern MacHinery Co. v. Under Secretary of WarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Higgins v. Shenango Pottery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Ebco Manufacturing Co. v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Metallurgical, Inc. v. The Renegotiation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- United States v. Northwest Automatic Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.