Burrell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is murder without malice; the punishment, 3 years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and we do not deem a recitation of the facts essential to a proper disposition of this appeal.
Initially, the overruling of appellant’s first motion for a continuance is relied on as a ground for reversal.
The motion alleged that Dr. Joseph A. Jachimczyk, Harris County Chief Medical Examiner, who had been subpoenaed by the State, was temporarily out of the country; that he had performed the autopsy on the deceased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Brock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Neely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Viser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
3Cited by13 opinions
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Denney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Whitfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.