Legal Opinion

Howcott v. Ruddock-Orleans Cypress Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 1, 1919No. 22345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Suit by Edith E. M. D. Howcott against the Ruddoct-Orleans Cypress Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.

Plaintiff owns the following squares in this city: No. 532, bounded by Cambronne, Edinburg, and Joliet streets and the right of way of the Illinois Central Railroad; No. 553, bounded by Edinburg, Joliet, Palm, and Leonidas streets; No. 570, bounded by Pahn, Joliet, Stroelitz, and Leonidas; No. 575, bounded by Palm, Leonidas, Stroelitz, and Monrose; No. 574, bounded by Palm, Monrose, Stroelitz, and Eagle; No. 575, bounded by Stroelitz, Eagle, Palmetto, and Monrose; and No. 594, bounded by Stroelitz, Leonidas, Monroe, and Palmetto. The streets here named exist as yet in that part of the city…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. Third MunicipalitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  2. Herbert v. BensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  3. Louisiana Construction & Improvement Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  4. Poydras v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1817
  5. Bell v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Giardina v. Marrero Furniture Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Worthen v. DeLongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Ruddock Orleans Cypress Co. v. KnopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Life v. GriffithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Herlitz v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API