Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Lanterman Developmental Center
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 2003No. 02-56095; D.C. No. CV-01-08797-NMMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Willette D. Jacobs appeals pro se orders of the district court vacating the clerk’s entry of default and dismissing the complaint. Although the district court did not enter final judgment, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the district court made clear its intent to terminate the action. See Spurlock v. F.B.I., 69 F.3d 1010, 1015 (9th Cir.1995). We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand.
We review the district court’s decision to set aside the entry of default for an abuse of discretion. O’Connor v. State of Nevada, 27 F.3d 357, 364 (9th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marjati Winarto v. Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Roger E.A. Taylor, Wayne Liem, Bill McKinley Ron Birtch, Nancy AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Freeman v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lyman D. Spurlock v. The Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ellison v. FletcherDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Smith v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020