Legal Opinion
Matter of Ace Mail Adver., Inc. v. Newgold
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 16, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
Appellant has been adjudged in contempt for violating the restraining provisions contained in an order in supplementary proceedings, dated November 25, 1930. The Appellate Division has certified six questions to this court, as the affirmance of the contempt order is not appealable without leave of the Appellate Division. An order adjudging a party guilty of a civil contempt in proceedings supplementary to execution is not a final order. (Hand v. Ortschreib Bldg. Corp., 254 N. Y. 15.)
The judgment against the appellant, obtained on June 30, 1930, was for $4,902.88. Under the supplementary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Rogall v. JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Finkelstein & HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Rottenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Kommel v. KarronCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Neugold v. Ace Mail Advertising, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- United States v. SloatDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.