Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Russ

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 1983No. WCB 80-03289, CA A22795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is compensability. The employer seeks reversal of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order affirming the referee’s finding that the claimant’s hip injury from an “unexplained fall” was compensable. We affirm.

Claimant, an 82-year-old laborer, was employed at a food-processing plant. On February 5, 1980, the date of the injury, claimant had worked a full eight-hour shift sorting onions on a production line. He finished his duties at 5 p.m. and proceeded from his work area to the time clock to “punch out” for the day. In traveling along his usual route…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Otto v. Moak Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Raines v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Hubble v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Puckett v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Koehler Electric v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. McAdams v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. MacKay v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API