Matter of Compensation of Russ
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
The issue in this workers’ compensation case is compensability. The employer seeks reversal of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order affirming the referee’s finding that the claimant’s hip injury from an “unexplained fall” was compensable. We affirm.
Claimant, an 82-year-old laborer, was employed at a food-processing plant. On February 5, 1980, the date of the injury, claimant had worked a full eight-hour shift sorting onions on a production line. He finished his duties at 5 p.m. and proceeded from his work area to the time clock to “punch out” for the day. In traveling along his usual route…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Otto v. Moak Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Raines v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Hubble v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Puckett v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Koehler Electric v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- McAdams v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- MacKay v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- McTaggart v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000