Sanitary Linen Service Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Alexander Proudfoot Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves a diversity suit having a contractual basis. The district court ruled for the plaintiff on a failure of consideration and restitution theory although not specifically so denominated. We affirm on the appeal of defendant. The district court denied plaintiff additional damages and a cross-appeal was taken on this ruling. We also affirm on the cross-appeal.
Defendant Proudfoot is an Illinois corporation which devises and installs systems to increase plant efficiency through what is sometimes known in the *293business world as short interval scheduling.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. McCallumSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
- Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Geneva Ann Singleton v. Percy ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Hobco, Inc. v. Tallahassee AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Rose Printing Co. v. HaggertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Sanitary Linen Service Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Alexander Proudfoot Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971