Legal Opinion

Sanitary Linen Service Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Alexander Proudfoot Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1971No. 28687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves a diversity suit having a contractual basis. The district court ruled for the plaintiff on a failure of consideration and restitution theory although not specifically so denominated. We affirm on the appeal of defendant. The district court denied plaintiff additional damages and a cross-appeal was taken on this ruling. We also affirm on the cross-appeal.

Defendant Proudfoot is an Illinois corporation which devises and installs systems to increase plant efficiency through what is sometimes known in the *293business world as short interval scheduling.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. McCallumSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  2. Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geneva Ann Singleton v. Percy ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Hobco, Inc. v. Tallahassee AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Rose Printing Co. v. HaggertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Sanitary Linen Service Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Alexander Proudfoot Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API