Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The plaintiff in error has appealed from a conviction of murder in the second degree. The assignments of error are, (1 and 2), that the evidence preponderates in favor of appellant’s innocence and against the verdict of the jury, (3) that the uncontroverted evidence shows “that the defendant shot the deceased in his own necessary self-defense”, (4) that a new trial should have been granted because one of the jurors “did not hear all of the statements of testimony of the defendant, Beed Lindsey, while testifying in the case in his own defense” and especially as to facts detailed by defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Durham v. StatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Woods v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lee v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Thomas v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. JeffersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Rosenthal v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Belondon v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. BerberianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API