Commonwealth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 67. — PROCEEDINGS BY THE COMMONWEALTH BY PROCTOR K. WILLIS, AUDITOR’S AGENT, AGAINST THE CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO., TO LIST OMITTED PROPERTY. Appeal from Greenup Circuit Court. S. G. Kinner, Circuit Judge. From a judgment dismissing the petition, the Commonwealth appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Hobson
Affirming.
This is a proceeding instituted by Proctor K. Willis, as Auditor’s agent, against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway in Kentucky, in the Greenup oonnty court, to list certain property claimed to be omitted. There was a judgment in the county court a,s prayed in the petition, but on appeal to the circuit court the petition was dismissed. The Commonwealth appeals.
The material facts are these: The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company in Kentucky is a corporation formed under section 841, Ky. Stats. The Maysville & Big Sandy Railway Company is a corporation…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kentucky Heating Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Crider v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Wayne v. BrumleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Dye Brothers v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Swift Coal & Timber Co. v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.