Legal Opinion

Stone v. Reynolds Metals Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 18, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 63-C-92PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARZA, District Judge.

The Plaintiff, William H. Stone, sues for damages resulting from injuries sustained by him while employed by Defendant, Reynolds Metals Company. The suit is based on diversity of citizenship, and jurisdiction is admitted by the parties.

In the pretrial order, the parties have stipulated that the Plaintiff was an employe of Defendant Reynolds on March 30, 1963, the date of Plaintiff’s alleged injuries; and that Defendant owned and controlled standard gauge tracks, one or more switch engines, called “dinkys”, and box cars, all wholly within the prop*441erty of Reynolds Metals…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nixson v. Mobil Oil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  2. Deery v. MoorheadMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1972
  3. Reynolds Metals Company v. William H. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Womack v. Rail Link, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API