Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watford v. Lawson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 16, 1940No. 3 Div. 328Published

1DissentGardner, Chief Justice

The original petition, construed, of course, in connection with the exhibits thereto, discloses that the documents in question are being held by the Attorney General as material evidence against petitioner upon his impeachment trial which has been ordered by the Governor as authorized by law. The majority opinion, without citation of authority, in .effect, holds that the Attorney General must surrender to the petitioner this material evidence which was to have been used in the impeachment proceedings against him.

I am fully persuaded this holding is directly contrary to the logic of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Murphy v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Azparren v. FerrelNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ex Parte BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API