Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Gilman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Mew York county. Action by Mary A. P. Tucker against Cornelia Gilman. Judgment was recovered against defendant, and, pending an appeal, Preble Tucker took an assignment thereof. He now appeals from an order directing him to pay the costs of the action upon the rendition of a judgment against plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The plaintiff, as the assignee of the receiver of the Kings County Manufacturing Company, a corporation formed under the manufacturing laws of this state, brought this action to recover the balance of 60 per cent, of the defendant’s unpaid subscription for the stock of the company. The receiver was appointed on the petition of the assignees in bankruptcy of Prances Mirick, who was a judgment creditor of the corporation. She recovered a judgment at the trial for the amount owing by the defendant on her subscription, and after it had been entered she made a written assignment of the judgment,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bolen v. . CrosbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Spears v. . Mayor, Etc., City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruddell v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Beck v. KeekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Beck v. KerrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API