Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Atkins

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gaby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Atkins & Co. against Hughes for goods sold and delivered upon his order, while he was acting under a decree of court as receiver of a hotel called the Sherman house in the city of Chicago. The only real question in the case is, whether the credit was given to Hughes or to Roberts, the former proprietor. Was Hughes the real purchaser, or was he only a guarantor for Roberts ? This question was left to the jury by the court in a series of instructions given for both parties, to which there is no substantial objection. They said, in substance, if the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geary v. O'NeilIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Geelan v. ReidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  3. Calverley v. WirthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Heggie v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Jones v. McLaughlin-Patrick Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API