Legal Opinion

Concord v. Merrimack County

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Claim: for aid furnished a pauper. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The pauper, at the time the assistance was rendered, had his settlement in Warner, through his mother, whose settlement was there. In 1879, on a claim against the county by Warner for aid furnished to the mother, the county commissioners, on the representations of the selectmen of that town, adjudged that she had no settlement in Warner nor one in any town in the state, and that the claim be paid, although in truth she had a settlement in Warner. The plaintiffs claim that this adjudication is conclusive of the question of the present pauper’s settlement, into which no further inquiry can be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salisbury v. Merrimack CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plymouth v. Grafton CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API