State v. Kuykendall

¶1 Daniel Kuykendall (Kuykendall) appeals from the judgment entered by the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, on his convictions and sentences for felony criminal endangerment and misdemeanor resisting arrest. We affirm.

¶2 Kuykendall raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it imposed restitution without considering Kuykendall’s ability to pay restitution and without setting a payment schedule?

¶4 2. Did the District Court’s imposition of restitution violate the excessive fines clause of Article II, Section 22 of the Montana Constitution?

BAC…