Legal Opinion
Svedberg v. Stamness
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1994No. Civ. 940192Published
1Opinion of the Court
525 N.W.2d 678 (1994)
Christian SVEDBERG, (Arlo and Darlene Svedberg), Petitioner and Appellee,
v.
Anthony STAMNESS, (Andrew and Charlene Stamness), Respondent and Appellant.
Civ. No. 940192.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
December 20, 1994.
Michael E. Keller (argued), The Bergquist Law Firm, Larimore, for respondent and appellant.
Lyle H. Moe, Grand Forks, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
NEUMANN, Justice.
Anthony Stamness appeals from a two-year disorderly conduct restraining order, issued under NDCC section 12.1-31.2-01 (Supp.1993), which enjoins specific threatening, abusive, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.