Legal Opinion

In re Powell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 2, 1996No. 24539PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance proceeding, respondent admits that he has committed ethical violations and consents to a public reprimand. We accept respondent’s admission and publicly reprimand him.

The ethical violations committed by respondent arose out of his representation of two clients in the purchase of a lot and mobile home. Although the closing took place on or about May 13, 1993, respondent admits that he did not file the clients’ application for a certificate of title to the mobile home until on or about January 17, 1995. He further admits that, without authorization, he signed the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of CelsorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API