Legal Opinion

Schieffelin v. Hylan

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

An injunction is sought to prevent the carrying out of a resolution of the board of estimate of the city of New York. The resolution provides for the sale of $4,500,000 of corporate stock of the city (long term bonds). The proceeds of $1,000,000 of this stock are “ for redemption of special revenue bonds issued for the purpose of providing funds to meet the expenses of the public service commission.” The proceeds of the balance ($3,500,000) are “to be paid into the general fund for the reduction of taxation.” The entire issue has been authorized on the theory that certain expenses of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MonticelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Pond v. NegusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Wells v. . Town of SalinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Brady v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Bigler v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mareno v. KibbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. L.C. Canyon Partners, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Schieffelin v. HylanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Stahl Soap Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Schieffelin v. HylanNew York Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API