Ashcraft v. Capco-Deluxe Generator Co.

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This appeal from the Kenton Circuit Court arises under the Workmen’s Compensation statutes and presents unique facts. The understanding of the questions involved depends upon grasp of the series of incidents from which the controversy stems. The incidents occurred in this chronological order:

Appellant, Ashcraft, sustained a com-pensable injury on March 2, 1961, while at work for appellee company.

On June 20, 1961, a compensation agreement between appellant and appellee was examined and approved by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The agreement was on the standard S.F. 4…