Legal Opinion

Jones v. Advance-Rumley Thrasher Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1918No. 9422Published

Complaint; from Murray superior court—Judge Tarver. November 3, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. The holder of a note is presumed to be such bona fide and for value. Civil Code (1910), § 4288.

2. There is nothing in the record to rebut the legal presumption above referred to; and under the testimony adduced the court properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See, in this connection, Edwards &c. Co. v. Vidalia Grocery Co., 144 Ga. 514 (87 S. E. 675, L. R. A. 1916D, 624).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edwards & Deutsch Lithographing Co. v. Vidalia Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916