Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Pleasants

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 11, 1834PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Anderson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Nicholas

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

To an action of covenant by Hanna and Co., for the use of Cresson and others, as partial assignees, against Pleasants and Bridges, on their covenant to pay a certain sum in such money as was received in the Farmer’s Bank of Harrodsburgh, they plead, in various forms, by way of set-off, certain promissory notes, which they field by assignment, on Iíanna and Co. To a replication to one of these pleas, they demurred; and their demurrer having been sustained, judgment was rendered in their favor ; from which Hanna and Co. prosecute this writ of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bigham v. MadisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Bradley v. Thompson Smith's SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Geoghegan v. DittoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  4. Edwards v. ToddIllinois Supreme Court · 1838
  5. William P. Clyde & Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API