Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Keene Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 20, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-0148PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Two motions are currently pending in this asbestos action. Both were filed by defendant Keene Corporation (“Keene”) and only affect the interests of third-party defendant EGNEP (Pty.), Ltd. (“EGNEP”). One is a motion to vacate the Order entered by this court on March 7, 1984, pursuant to Eastern District of Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b), which dismissed this action due to a settlement of the action by the parties. The other motion is a request for entry of default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). Neither motion has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hutton v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Hutton v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
3Cited by14 opinions
- Catherine M. Jones v. Winnepesaukee RealtyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Restaurants Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- KPS & Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.