Legal Opinion
Hayt, Hayt & Landau v. Hall
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided February 21, 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard S. Lane, J.
Plaintiff is assignee of defendant Hall’s original attorney in her matrimonial action, and is suing herein for counsel fees fixed in amount of $9,250 at the time defendants Colton, Hartnick, Yamin & Sheresky were substituted as defendant Hall’s attorneys. Defendant Roday is an associate with Colton, Hartnick, Yamin & Sheresky who worked on the case.
*783The matrimonial action was settled without notice to plaintiff’s assignor upon terms and conditions not completely revealed in the papers except to the extent that defendant Hall was allowed to refinance the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Marsano v. State Bank of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v. RichardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987