Legal Opinion
Horwitt v. Horwitt
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 9, 1950No. Civ. 2826PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s complaint sets out a claim against the defendant based upon his statutory obligation to reimburse the Estate of Paul H. Horwitt for his, the defendant’s pro rata share of the Federal estate tax and interest assessed against said estate insofar as said tax was imposed against said estate by the United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service, on the fair market value of the contract entered into between the decedent Paul H. Horwitt and the Marathon Paper Mills Company, now known as the Marathon Corporation, on November 1, 1937. ■
The decedent Paul…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Tipton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jeffery's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Merchants National Bank v. Merchants National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Parlato v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyd Leedom, as Chairman and Members of National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108, Afl-Cio, General Cable Corporation v. Boyd Stewart Leedom, Individually and as Chairman and Members of and Constituting National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Leedom v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Forsgren v. GilliozDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.