Legal Opinion

Dorrough v. MacKenson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1934No. 6 Div. 563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

The brief filed here on behalf of appellant, there being none filed for appellee, is constructed in total disregard of rules 10 and 12 of Supreme Court practice (pages 882 and 883, Code 1923, vol. 4).

While the disposition of the appellate courts of our state seems to be to condone this fault where it can be done without practically abrogating the said rules (Brothers v. Brothers, 208 Ala. 258, 94 So. 175; Griffin Burial Ass’n v. Snead, 25 Ala. App. 543, 149 So. 875), yet, so far as we are advised, the holding delineated by Mr. Justice Gardner for the Supreme Court in the opinion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Brothers v. BrothersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Lester v. EnzorAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Griffin Burial Ass'n v. SneadAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorrough v. MacKensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API