Legal Opinion

Reves v. Ernst & Young

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 16, 1990No. 88-1480Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

494 U.S. 56 (1990)

REVES ET AL.

v.

ERNST & YOUNG

No. 88-1480.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 27, 1989

Decided February 21, 1990

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

John R. McCambridge argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Gary M. Elden, Jay R. Hoffman, and Robert R. Cloar.

Michael R. Lazerwitz argued the cause for the Securities and Exchange Commission as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Starr, Deputy Solicitor General Merrill, Daniel L. Goelzer, Paul Gonson, Jacob H. Stillman, Martha…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Marshall; Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API