Legal Opinion
Burrows v. Chemed Corp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided June 30, 1983No. 81-560C(1)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
567 F.Supp. 978 (1983)
Mary Dell BURROWS, Plaintiff,
v.
CHEMED CORPORATION, d/b/a Vestal Laboratories, Defendant.
No. 81-560C(1).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
June 30, 1983.
Melba I. Parente, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiff.
Diane T. Davidson, John R. Truman, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Dell Burrows brought this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. She alleges that the discriminatory actions of the defendant denied her the opportunity for equal pay increases, promotions, and training.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- James JOHNSON and Benjamin White, Appellants, v. BUNNY BREAD COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Martin MARQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OMAHA DISTRICT SALES OFFICE, FORD DIVISION OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Brewer v. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Foster v. Township of HillsideDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Cobb v. Anheuser Busch, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
- Washington v. Dayton Hudson Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.