Legal Opinion

Croen v. Bosco

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Frank E. Johnson,

Official Referee. The purpose of the proceedings is indicated in the statement. The grounds of the application are, generally, the alleged unreality of the respondents’ factual claims to be eligible to vote in Putnam County. That alleged eligibility appears to be, in all the cases heard, based upon the claimed factual situation of their physical “ residences ” in that county, coupled with their alleged state of mind (intention) as to what “residence” they each had therein. Was it a temporary and recurrent “ summer residence,” or a permanent, continuous, legal residence?

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rawstorne v. MaguireNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Bischoff v. BischoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Hurley v. Union Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Maloney v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Hislop v. TaaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Croen v. BoscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API