Legal Opinion

Hines v. Office

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1936No. 2583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, PJ.

The above entitled cause is now being determined on proceedings in error from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio, and in connection 'therewith motion of defendant in error for an affirmance of judgment for the reason that no bill of exceptions has been filed by plaintiff in error.

An examination of the file discloses that a bill of exceptions has been filed but- it contains nothing more than the court’s charge to the jury.

The bill contains no part of the evidence.

The law does not require tha.t a bill of exceptions contain all that transpired…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harper v. McQuownOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Tanski v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Crawford v. TarvinOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API