Legal Opinion

(HC) Calderon v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 16, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00956Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-00956-CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a county inmate proceeding pro se in this federal habeas corpus action filed 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the 19 court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it 20 is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Bruce Wayne Morris v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Nevius v. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API