Legal Opinion

Evans v. Provident Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1935No. Appeal, 202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

The question presented for our determination in this appeal is whether the terms of the Act of January 17, 1934, P. L. 243 (the Deficiency Judgment Act), preclude a mortgagee, upon default, from realizing upon additional collateral pledged for the obligation, before foreclosing on the mortgage and establishing a deficiency judgment. The answer is clearly in the negative.

Plaintiff filed an amended bill in the court below for an injunction restraining the sale of additional collateral pledged with the mortgage, and took the present appeal from a decree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landberg v. Equitable Investment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Hampton v. Congress Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Ayres v. WattsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Anderson v. Hamilton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1936
  3. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Commercial Building Ass'n v. Steen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1935
  5. Hamilton Equipment, Inc. v. Onamia Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API