Legal Opinion

Hazelwood Lumber Co., Inc. v. Smallhoover

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1982No. 24 W.D. Appeal DKT 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

Appellants, Joseph T. and Dorothy K. Smallhoover, appeal by allowance from an order of the Superior Court affirming an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which struck from the record “satisfaction” of a judgment, against appellants, in favor of appellee, Hazelwood Lumber Company, Inc. The order appealed from was based upon the old common law rule that payment of a sum less than the face amount of a liquidated debt presently due lacks the consideration necessary to support a binding accord and *182satisfaction. We hold that rule…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. California Claim Service, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Brockley v. BrockleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Fowler v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. DeTurck v. MatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Epstein v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nicholas, J. v. Hofmann, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Brandt v. EagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Brandt v. EagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Brandt v. EagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Brandt v. EagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API