Georgia Railroad v. Cubbedge, Hazlehurst & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford. J.
When one is entrusted with the effects of another to sell or dispose of for the benefit of the latter, and to account to him therefor, the mere fact that he who was so entrusted has failed to account does not create a debt which is exempted from a discharge in bankruptcy, under §5117 of the revised statutes of the United States, for fraud, embezzlement, or as being a debt created in a fiduciary capacity, there being no proof showing that in appropriating the property or proceeds, it was done wrongfully and fraudently and with a fraudulent intent at the time. Ill U. S. R., 676 ; 2…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Jones v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Snell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873