Legal Opinion

Reid v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 1990No. 88-3270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We affirm the judgment and sentence except as to costs. The defendant received a sentence of five years incarceration on one count and ten years on another. However, after serving the first thirty months incarceration, he was to be on concurrent probation for a balance of 2⅛⅛ and 5 years respectively. This constitutes a “true” split sentence. Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988). In the event defendant should violate, he cannot be resen-tenced to a term, including time served, in excess of the original sentence imposed. Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Tyner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Regueiro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API