Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Planters Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On appeal from the superior court of chancery; Hon. Stephen Cooke, chancellor. The opinion of the court contains a sufficient statement of the facts of the case.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error filed his bill for an injunction and a new trial of a judgment at law, rendered against him in the circuit court of "Warren county, as a member of the firm of J. Gilmore & Co., on a note executed by the firm, upon the allegation that he was not a member of that firm, and did not execute the note. • The pleadings show, that he was regularly served in person, with process in the action at law"; that a plea was filed for all the parties to the suit, which was withdrawn and a judgment by default rendered. Neither the bill or proof exhibits any sufficient excuse on "the part…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gum Carbo Co. v. New Orleans German GazetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Weddell v. SealMississippi Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API