Legal Opinion

Lear Eye Clinic, Ltd. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 10, 1996No. 13406-90, 19117-90, 177-91Published

1Opinion of the Court

106 T.C. No. 23

UNITED STATES TAX COURT LEAR EYE CLINIC, LTD., ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent* Docket Nos. 13406-90, 19117-90, Filed June 10, 1996. 177-91. Gregory A. Robinson, Brad S. Ostroff, and Neil H. Hiller, for petitioners. Anne W. Durning, for respondent. Held, for purposes of determining the limitation under sec. 415(b), I.R.C., on benefits of a plan, the term "service with the employer" shall include service with businesses that antedate the plan sponsor where the transition results in a mere technical change in the employment relationship and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API