Hubert v. Magidson
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
243 S.W.2d 337 (1951)
HUBERT et ux.
v.
MAGIDSON et al.
No. 42320.
Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.
November 12, 1951.
Joseph A. Kirkwood, St. Louis, for appellants.
Max Sigoloff, St. Louis, for respondents.
COIL, Commissioner.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, sought a mandatory injunction requiring respondents to remove alleged encroachments from an easement reserved in a deed, and for specific performance of a contract providing for the improvement of the easement.
We have jurisdiction because appellants adduced testimony to the effect that unless the injunctive relief was awarded their property…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Aufderheide v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Middelton v. ReeceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Warren v. CavanaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Cook v. FerbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Umphres v. J.R. Mayer Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Amitin v. IzardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Copanas v. LoehrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- RFS, INC. v. CohenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Troske v. Martigney Creek Sewer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.