Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Bartholomew

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 22, 1913PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Hugh Brennan, Judge. Action for damages was tried to jury which, upon the introduction of evidence in chief for plaintiff by direction of court, returned a verdict for defendant. Thereupon plaintiff moved for new trial. The motion was sustained, and' defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Cottage Grove avenue in Des Moines extends east and west, as does University street, and both are inter*60seeted by Twenty-First street running north and south. On either side of the latter are dwelling houses averaging less than one hundred feet apart between the two intersecting streets, which are a third of a mile apart, so that the speed of an automobile on November 3, 1910, might not lawfully exceed ten miles an hour. Sections 1571a, 1571h, Code Supp. On that day Reeve, an automobile chauffeur, invited plaintiff, a policeman, to take a ride with him in a Buick runabout, and at about 1…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wymore v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Nesbit v. Town of GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Bush v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Burk v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. McLeod v. Shelly Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Johnson v. DodgenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Tannehill v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API