Advance Lumber Co. v. Laurel National Bank
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the chancery court of Jones county. ILon. James L. McCasKill, Chancellor. The Laurel National Bank, the appellee, was complainant, and the lumber company, the appellant, was defendant in the court below.
Read the full summary
From the chancery court of Jones county. ILon. James L. McCasKill, Chancellor. The Laurel National Bank, the appellee, was complainant, and the lumber company, the appellant, was defendant in the court below. From a decree in favor of the complainant the defendant appealed to the supreme court. . The Laurel National Bank filed the bill in this case in the chancery court of Jones county against the Advance Lumber Company, alleging that the defendant was indebted to complainant in the sum of $897.'30. The bill further alleges that the Advance Lumber Company is a non-resident of the state, and…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteielb, C. J.
The remedy sought to be pursued here was an attachment in chancery, yet only personal property was levied upon, and no bond was given, as provided by Code 1892, § 518, nor affidavit made, as provided by Code 1892, § 512. An attachment cannot be issued by the chancery court except in accordance with sec. 486, et seq. It must conform to the provisions of the law as announced in sec. 486; it must show that the nonresident “has lands and tenements within this state, or it must go against any such debtor and persons in this state as have in their hands effects of, or are indebted to, such…
2Cited by7 opinions
- I. B. Rowell & Co. v. SandiferMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Lee v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Crescent Plywood Company v. LawrenceMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
- Delta Ins. & Realty Co. v. Interstate Fire Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Delta Ins. & Realty Agency v. Fourth Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.