Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hiatt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Weaver, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff. The amended answer admits the making of the note, but states that it was given for a frame house 20 by 24 in size, standing upon the northeast quarter of sec. 28, town 11, range 2 west, and the improvements on the east half of the northeast quarter of the same section; that said property did not belong to the *504plaintiff, but to one Myron L. Grant, and the defendant was compelled to pay him over $500 therefor. On the trial of the cause a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant, upon which judgment was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Sioux County v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API