Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of New Orleans v. Advanced Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 2013No. Nos. 2013-CA-0409, 2013-CA-0410Published

1DissentDysart, J.

hBecause I find that Hamp’s/AEC was a non-responsive bidder, I respectfully dissent.

The bid in question required that there be a thirty-five percent DBE1 participation on the referenced project. Hamp’s/AEC submitted a DBE form indicating that it was able to meet the DBE goal by subcontracting with Boines Construction Equipment Co., Inc., After reviewing the DBE responsiveness form (DBE-1), the City deemed the bid non-responsive because Mr. Hampton had signed the form for the president of Boines. After the bid was rejected as non-_|responsive,2 Hamp’s/AEC submitted the affidavit of Michael…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. HAMP'S CONST. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Command Construction Industries, L.L.C. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Enmon Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Aviation BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API