Legal Opinion

I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. C. Ludwig Baumann & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff installed a sprinkler system in premises, which were leased to the Brooklyn Furniture Company, under a contract made with that company and with the consent of the landlord. The contract provided that title should remain in the plaintiff and at the termination of the contract or breach or repudiation thereof by the Brooklyn Furniture Company, the plaintiff might, at its own cost and expense, enter upon the premises and remove any or all of the equipment. Though the sprinkler system remained the personal property of the plaintiff, its rights were qualified by the necessity of an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Suydam v. Jenkins, SheriffThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850
  4. Pennybecker v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Walker v. SchindelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKeon v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. ATLAS HOTEL SUPPLY COMPANY v. BaneyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. McKeon v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lysenko v. SawayaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Seaboard Securities Co., Inc. v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API